Publicaties
Gekozen filters:
Gekozen filters:
Plans of pluralism: comments on 'explanatory pluralism in psychiatry' Universiteit Gent
In this paper, I comment on Raffaella Campaner’s (forthcoming) overview of the debate on explanatory pluralism in psychiatry. In her overview, Campaner distinguishes between, on the one hand, pluralists that consider pluralism to be a temporary state and, on the other hand, pluralists that consider it to be a persisting state. I suggest that it would be helpful to distinguish more than those two plans of pluralism, i.e. different understandings ...
From plurality to pluralism in social science: what can we learn from international political economy? Universiteit Gent
Plurality without (full) countability : on mass-like categories in lexical plurals Universiteit Gent
Towards democratic models of science: exploring the case of scientific pluralism Universiteit Gent
Scientific pluralism, a normative endorsement of the plurality or multiplicity of research approaches in science, has recently been advocated by several philosophers (e.g., Kellert et al. 2006, Kitcher 2001, Longino 2013, Mitchell 2009, and Chang 2010). Comparing these accounts of scientific pluralism, one will encounter quite some variation. We want to clarify the different interpretations of scientific pluralism by showing how they incarnate ...
Legal Pluralism, Human Rights and the Right to Vote: The Case of the Noken System in Papua Universiteit Hasselt
The goal of this article is to explore the clash between international human rights law and a legal pluralist framework in the case of the noken system and also to investigate potential solutions to the clash. Elections in Indonesia are generally founded on the principle of direct, universal, free, secret, honest and fair voting. There is a notable exception in the Province of Papua, where tribes in the Central Mountains area are following the ...
Democratic Models of Science: The Case of Scientific Pluralism Universiteit Gent
Scientific pluralism, a normative endorsement of the plurality or multiplicity of research approaches in science, has recently been advocated by several philosophers (e.g., Kellert et al. 2006, Kitcher 2001, Longino 2013, Mitchell 2009, and Chang 2010). Comparing these accounts of scientific pluralism, one will encounter quite some variation. We want to clarify the different interpretations of scientific pluralism by showing how they incarnate ...
What can democratic theory teach us about scientific pluralism, objectivity and consensus? Universiteit Gent
Scientific pluralism, a normative endorsement of the plurality or multiplicity of knowledge systems in science, has recently been advocated by several philosophers of science (e.g., Kellert et al. 2006, Kitcher 2002, Longino 2002, Mitchell 2009, and Chang 2010). Comparing these accounts of scientific pluralism, one will encounter quite some variation. We want to clarify the different interpretations of scientific pluralism by showing how they ...
Legal pluralism and islam in the scales of the European Court of Human Rights : the limits of categorical balancing Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Starting from the Refah v. Turkey case we dig deeper in the issue of conflicting rights in pluralist legal systems, comparing the Strasbourg Courts case law with solutions devised in the Malaysian legal system. Legal pluralism generally includes a set of tensions between the minorities rights to live following their own norms and rules (article 27 ICCPR and article 8 ECHR), the religious freedom (article 9 ECHR) and, the equality and ...