Publicaties
Gekozen filters:
Gekozen filters:
Mutual admissibility of evidence in criminal matters in the EU: a study of telephone tapping and house search Universiteit Gent
Any effort to gather evidence may prove pointless without ensuring its admissibility. Despite this fact, the EU still remains silent with regard to the admissibility of evidence collected in the EU cross-border context. The recent instrument developed to ensure the free gathering and use of evidence in the EU, namely the European investigation order, does not refer to the admissibility of evidence collected within this instrument at all. ...
Mutual admissibility of evidence in criminal matters in the EU: a study of telephone tapping and house search Universiteit Gent
Any effort to gather evidence may prove pointless without ensuring its admissibility. Despite this fact, the EU still remains silent with regard to the admissibility of evidence collected in the EU cross-border context. The recent instrument developed to ensure the free gathering and use of evidence in the EU, namely the European investigation order, does not refer to the admissibility of evidence collected within this instrument at all. ...
Prosecuting and punishing offenders for several offences in Poland Universiteit Gent
Unblurring the fuzzy line between specialty and data protection in EU mutual legal assistance after the European Investigation Order Universiteit Gent
The purpose limitation principle takes a central place in data privacy law. The specialty principle plays a key role in international cooperation in criminal matters, including in the context of mutual legal assistance (MLA), which is aimed at the cross-border collection and use of information and evidence. Since the specialty principle also frames use limitations for information or evidence obtained through MLA and must therefore be considered ...