< Terug naar vorige pagina
Publicatie
Demands of a Transnational Public Sphere: The diplomatic conflict between Joseph Chamberlain and Bernhard von Bülow and how the mass press shaped expectations for mediatized politics around the turn of the twentieth century
Tijdschriftbijdrage - Tijdschriftartikel
Scholarship on media and politics presumes a ‘mediatization’ of
politics over time, which overlooks the evolution of a mediatized
public sphere that shaped people’s understandings of what actually
constituted politics. This article investigates the public sphere
to demonstrate how it created expectations for politicians and
journalists within the process of the mediatization of politics. To
understand how political behaviour changed as a result of mediatization,
this article focuses on the turn of the twentieth century,
when politics faced an emerging mass press. It analyses one of the
most violent episodes of the ‘press wars’ between Germany and
Britain before the First World War. In 1901, British Colonial
Secretary Joseph Chamberlain allegedly insulted the German
Army, to which German Imperial Chancellor Bernhard von Bülow
reacted aggressively, resulting in a media storm across Europe and
the failing of the British-German alliance talks that paved the way
for Britain’s Entente Cordiale with France. Part of the reason why
this situation escalated was that newspapers in Britain and
Germany expressed expectations for politicians to represent the
angry opinions of their publics as voiced in the press. However,
many newspapers also demanded that Bülow and Chamberlain
moderate public opinion by influencing and censoring the press.
While Bülow and Chamberlain were ahead of their time in paying
attention to press opinions, seeking publicity and managing the
press, they failed to meet the contradictory expectations of catering
to jingoism while appeasing a foreign public. Meanwhile,
newspapers reflected on their political impact on this situation,
and started expecting more press responsibility, which moderated
the crisis. The case shows how media and politics were not separated
spheres, but interacted within a transnational public sphere
in which expectations for political and journalistic behaviour were
continuously being (re)shaped.
Tijdschrift: European Review of History / Revue Européenne d'Histoire
ISSN: 1350-7486
Issue: 3
Volume: 26
Pagina's: 476 - 504
Jaar van publicatie:2019
BOF-keylabel:ja
IOF-keylabel:ja
CSS-citation score:1
Authors from:Higher Education
Toegankelijkheid:Closed