A systematic literature review on the effects of exercise on human Toll-like receptor expression

BACKGROUND: Toll-like receptors (TLRs) are a family of transmembrane pattern recognition receptors that are mainly expressed on immune cells. Recognition of various exogenous and endogenous molecular patterns activates the TLR signalling cascade, which orchestrates an inflammatory immune response. Dysfunctional immune responses, including aberrant TLR signalling, are increasingly implicated in the associations between sedentarism, chronic low-grade systemic inflammation and various non-communicable diseases. Conversely, exercise exerts anti-inflammatory effects, which could be conferred through its immunomodulatory properties, potentially affecting TLRs. This study aims to systematically review the effects of exercise on human TLR expression.

METHOD: A systematic literature search of Pubmed, Embase, The Cochrane Library and SPORTDiscus for articles addressing the impact of exercise (as isolated intervention) on TLRs in humans was conducted, ending in February 2020.

RESULTS: A total of 66 articles were included. The publications were categorised according to exercise modality and duration: acute resistance exercise (4 studies), acute aerobic exercise (26 studies), resistance training program (9 studies), aerobic training program (16 studies), combined (i.e. resistance and aerobic) training program (8 studies) and chronic exercise not otherwise classifiable (9 studies). Five articles investigated more than one of the aforementioned exercise categories. Several trends could be discerned with regard to the TLR response in the different exercise categories. Acute resistance exercise seemed to elicit TLR upregulation, whereas acute aerobic exercise had less activating potential with the majority of responses being neutral or, especially in healthy participants, downregulatory. Chronic resistance and combined exercise programs predominantly resulted in unaltered or decreased TLR levels. In the chronic aerobic exercise category, mixed effects were observed, but the majority of measurements demonstrated unchanged TLR expression.

CONCLUSION: Currently published research supports an interplay between exercise and TLR signalling, which seems to depend on the characteristics of the exercise. However, there was large heterogeneity in the study designs and methodologies. Therefore, additional research is required to further corroborate these findings, to define its pathophysiological implications and to elucidate the mechanism(s) linking exercise to TLR signalling.