< Terug naar vorige pagina
Publicatie
Variable arrangements between residential and productive activities
Tijdschriftbijdrage - Tijdschriftartikel
Ondertitel:Conceiving mixed-use for urban development in Brussels
Mixing productive economic activities with housing is a hot topic in academic and policy discourses on the redevelopment
of large cities today. Mixed‐use is proposed to reduce adverse effects of modernist planning such as single‐use zoning,
traffic congestion, and loss of quality in public space. Moreover, productive city discourses plead for the re‐integration of
industry and manufacturing in the urban tissue. Often, historical examples of successful mixed‐use in urban areas serve
as a guiding image, with vertical symbiosis appearing as the holy grail of the live‐work mix‐discourse. This article examines
three recent live‐work mix projects developed by a public real estate agency in Brussels. We investigate how different
spatial layouts shape the links between productive, residential, and other land uses and how potential conflicts between
residents and economic actors are mediated. We develop a theoretical framework based on earlier conceptualisations of
mixed‐use development to analyse the spatial and functional relationships within the projects. We situate them within the
housing and productive city policies in Brussels. From this analysis, we conclude that mixed‐use should be understood by
considering spatial and functional relationships at various scales and by studying the actual spatial layout of shared spaces,
logistics and nuisance mitigation. Mixed‐use is highly contextual, depending on the characteristics of the area as well as
policy goals. The vertical symbiosis between different land uses is but one example of valid mixed‐use strategies along with
good neighbourship, overlap, and tolerance. As such, future commercial and industrial areas will occur in various degrees
of mixity in our cities.
of large cities today. Mixed‐use is proposed to reduce adverse effects of modernist planning such as single‐use zoning,
traffic congestion, and loss of quality in public space. Moreover, productive city discourses plead for the re‐integration of
industry and manufacturing in the urban tissue. Often, historical examples of successful mixed‐use in urban areas serve
as a guiding image, with vertical symbiosis appearing as the holy grail of the live‐work mix‐discourse. This article examines
three recent live‐work mix projects developed by a public real estate agency in Brussels. We investigate how different
spatial layouts shape the links between productive, residential, and other land uses and how potential conflicts between
residents and economic actors are mediated. We develop a theoretical framework based on earlier conceptualisations of
mixed‐use development to analyse the spatial and functional relationships within the projects. We situate them within the
housing and productive city policies in Brussels. From this analysis, we conclude that mixed‐use should be understood by
considering spatial and functional relationships at various scales and by studying the actual spatial layout of shared spaces,
logistics and nuisance mitigation. Mixed‐use is highly contextual, depending on the characteristics of the area as well as
policy goals. The vertical symbiosis between different land uses is but one example of valid mixed‐use strategies along with
good neighbourship, overlap, and tolerance. As such, future commercial and industrial areas will occur in various degrees
of mixity in our cities.
Tijdschrift: Urban Planning
ISSN: 2183-7635
Issue: 3
Volume: 6
Pagina's: 334-349
Jaar van publicatie:2021
Trefwoorden:Brussels, Housing, Mixed-use, Productive activities, Urban Development
Toegankelijkheid:Open