< Terug naar vorige pagina

Publicatie

The Facts and Practices of Moral Responsibility

Tijdschriftbijdrage - Tijdschriftartikel

Strawsonians about moral responsibility often claim that our practices of holding morally responsible fix the facts of moral responsibility, rather than the other way round. Many have argued that such ‘reversal’ claims have an unwelcome consequence: If our practices of holding morally responsible fix the facts of moral responsibility, does this not imply, absurdly, that if we held severely mentally ill people responsible, they would be responsible? We provide a new Strawsonian answer to this question, and we explore the relation between reversal claims and (in)compatibilism.
Tijdschrift: Pacific Philosophical Quarterly
ISSN: 0279-0750
Issue: 3
Volume: 100
Pagina's: 790 - 811
Jaar van publicatie:2019
BOF-keylabel:ja
IOF-keylabel:ja
CSS-citation score:1
Authors from:Higher Education
Toegankelijkheid:Open