Split-belt treadmill walking in patients with Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review

Background: Walking on a split-belt treadmill (SBT) can help to modulate an asymmetric gait, particularly for people with neurological conditions, such as Parkinson’s disease (PD), where asymmetry plays a role due to the laterality of the disease. Research question: This systematic review critically evaluates the literature on SBT in PD. First, different SBT paradigms and methodological approaches were evaluated. Second, the review explored how people with PD adapt their gait to different SBT conditions compared to healthy controls (HC). Methods: We conducted a systematic search of the PubMED, PsychINFO, and Web of Knowledge databases. Original research articles, published in English and investigating SBT walking in people with PD, were included. Results: From the 925 studies originally identified, seven met the inclusion criteria and were selected for evaluation (n = 118 individuals with PD of whom 44 had freezing of gait (FOG)). The SBT paradigms varied across studies regarding the SBT settings, definitions of gait variables, and criteria for determining dominance of body side. Gait variability and bilateral coordination were found to adapt to the SBT condition similarly in people with PD and healthy controls (HC). Inconsistent results were found with respect to the adaptation of gait asymmetry, for the differences between PD and HC participants. The subgroup of people with PD and FOG showed reduced accuracy in detecting belt speed differences and slower adaptation to SBT conditions. Conclusion: Individuals with mild to moderately severe PD adapted similarly to HCs to SBT walking for gait variability and bilateral gait coordination. However, those with FOG had impaired perception of belt speed differences and did not adapt their gait so readily. Although SBT can be useful for modulating gait asymmetry in some people with PD, it was not beneficial for all. We recommend standardization of SBT protocols for clinical practice in future studies.

Jaar van publicatie:2019

BOF-keylabel:ja

IOF-keylabel:ja

BOF-publication weight:2

CSS-citation score:2

Auteurs:International

Authors from:Higher Education

Toegankelijkheid:Open