< Back to previous page

Publication

Importance of lymph node response after neoadjuvant chemoradiation for esophageal adenocarcinoma

Journal Contribution - e-publication

BACKGROUND Tumor response and lymph node involvement are the most important prognosticators in resected patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma after neoadjuvant chemoradiation (nCRT). We hypothesise that lymph node response (LNR) is also a valuable prognosticator in these patients, potentially revealing the added effect of nCRT. METHODS Hematoxylin-eosin slides of 193 esophageal adenocarcinoma patients with clinical suspicion of lymph node involvement (cN+) and treated with nCRT between 2008 and 2015 were assessed. Lymph nodes containing viable tumor cells were considered ypN+ and those negative for viable tumor were ypN0. LNR was also described according to an earlier defined method. Three groups were obtained: ypN0/LNR-, ypN0/LNR+ and ypN+. They were compared to 188 cN+ patients being pN0 (n=45) or pN+ (n=143) after upfront esophageal resection. RESULTS 44 patients were ypN0/LNR-, 55 ypN0/LNR+ and 94 ypN+. Median overall survival was respectively 96.4, 31.2 and 20.6 months and was significantly different between ypN0/LNR- and ypN0/LNR+ groups (p=0.020). Survival was comparable between ypN0/LNR- and pN0 (104.2 months) groups (p=0.519) and between ypN+ and pN+ (21,6 months) groups (p=0,966). In ypN0 patients, risk of death in LNR+ patients was tripled compared to LNR- patients. CONCLUSIONS In cN+ esophageal adenocarcinoma patients treated with nCRT with postoperative final pathology being ypN0, median overall survival is tripled when no signs of LNR were found and comparable to cN+/pN0 upfront esophagectomy patients, suggesting that 23% of patients treated with nCRT were in fact true N0 and overtreated by nCRT. ypN+ patients have no survival benefit compared to pN+ patients.
Journal: Annals of Thoracic Surgery
ISSN: 0003-4975
Issue: 6
Volume: 112
Pages: 1 - 28
Publication year:2020
BOF-keylabel:yes
IOF-keylabel:yes
BOF-publication weight:3
CSS-citation score:2
Authors from:Higher Education
Accessibility:Open