Implementation of physiological functional spinal units in a rigid-body model of the thoracolumbar spine

Most of the current rigid-body models of the complete thoracolumbar spine do not properly model the intervertebral joint as the highly nonlinear stiffness is not incorporated comprehensively and the effects of compressive load on stiffness is commonly being neglected. Based on published in vitro data of individual intervertebral joint flexibility, multi-level six degree-of-freedom nonlinear stiffness of functional spinal units was modelled and incorporated in a rigid-body model of the thoracolumbar spine. To estimate physiological in vivo conditions of the entire spine, stiffening effects caused by directly applied compressive loads, and contributions to mono-segmental stiffness from the rib cage as well as multi-segmental interactions in the thoracic spine were analysed and implemented. Forward dynamic simulations were performed to simulate in vitro tests that measured the load-displacement response of the spine under various loading conditions. The predicted kinematic responses of the model were in agreement with in vitro measurements, with correlations between simulated and measured segmental displacements varying between 0.66 and 0.97 (p < 0.05) and average deviations below 1.6°. Coupling relationships were found between lateral bending and axial rotation. Under compressive loads, the model behaved stiffer and showed a decreased range of motion: The flexion/extension response of the full thoracolumbar spine under compressive loads up to 800 N was found to strongly correlate with the literature (r = 0.99, p < 0.0001). The implementation of physiological functional spinal units with nonlinear stiffness properties into rigid-body models can enhance accuracy of biomechanical simulations, and enable detailed analysis of spinal kinematics under complex loading conditions seen in vivo.

Publication year:2020

BOF-keylabel:yes

IOF-keylabel:yes

BOF-publication weight:1

CSS-citation score:1

Authors:International

Authors from:Higher Education

Accessibility:Open