Remarks on Immanuel Kant's assessment on the use of the thesis of innate evil in moral philosophy (Religion, 6:50-51)

In Part One of Immanuel Kants Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason (1793), the so-called thesis of innate evil (The human being is by nature evil) notoriously plays a central role. Yet in the General Remark closing that part, Kant minimizes the weight of that thesis. In his view, it is of no use in moral dogmatics, and also in moral discipline its meaning is of a limited nature. Consequently, the thesis of innate evil is both relegated to a short footnote in the Introduction and completely passed over in silence in the Doctrine of the methods of ethics in Kants Metaphysical Principles of the Doctrine of Virtue (1797). This article investigates Kants assessment of the use of the thesis of innate evil in moral philosophy. It explores Kants semantics of the thesis in order to find out why the thesis makes no difference in moral philosophy, and tries to demonstrate why it is silenced furthermore in the methods of ethics.

Publication year:2017