< Back to previous page

Publication

Comparison between lithium dilution and pulse contour analysis techniques for cardiac output measurement in isoflurane anaesthetized ponies: influence of different inotropic drugs

Journal Contribution - Journal Article

Objective To compare cardiac output (Qt) measurements using lithium dilution (LiDCO) and pulse contour analysis (PulseCO) techniques in isoflurane-anaesthetized ponies before and during the administration of different inotropic/vasoactive drugs. Study design Prospective randomized experimental cross-over trial. Animals Six ponies aged 5.0 +/- 1.6 (4-6.5) years and weighing 286 +/- 53 (212-368) kg. Methods After sedation (romifidine) and induction (midazolam + ketamine), anaesthesia was maintained with isoflurane in oxygen. After 90 minutes (= T0), one of four treatments was administered: saline 0.1 mL kg(-1) (S), enoximone 0.5 mg kg(-1) IV (E), enoximone followed by dobutamine (0.5 mu g kg(-1) minute(-1) for 120 minutes) (ED) or enoximone followed by a calcium chloride infusion (0.5 mg kg(-1) minute(-1) for 10 minutes) (EC). Data were recorded for 120 minutes after T0. The PulseCO (recorded from carotid artery) was calibrated before T0, no further recalibrations were performed. Qt was determined with LiDCO (Qt(LiDCO)) and PulseCO (Qt(PulseCO)) simultaneously at T5, T10, T20, T40, T60, T80, T100 and T120. Systemic vascular resistances (SVRLiDCO and SVRPulseCO) were calculated. Results In the saline group, Qt(PulseCO) was 4.9 +/- 12.3% lower than LiDCO (p < 0.01), whereas SVRPulseCO was 6.9 +/- 14.4% higher than SVRLiDCO (p < 0.01). These differences increased over time (mean +/- SEM), Qt by 0.06 +/- 0.03% minute(-1) (p = 0.042) and SVR by 0.08 +/- 0.03% minute(-1) (p = 0.018). Qt(PulseCO) was higher than Qt(LiDCO) in the EC group (1.8 +/- 23.3%), but lower than Qt(LiDCO) in groups E (-11.7 +/- 20.4%) and ED (-10.0 +/- 25.9%) (significant difference between treatments, p < 0.01). The differences in SVR in groups E (20.4 +/- 32.0%) and ED (20.7 +/- 35.3%) were significantly higher than in groups S (6.9 +/- 14.4%) and EC (3.1 +/- 22.2%) (p < 0.01). Conclusions and clinical relevance Pulse contour analysis values deviated significantly from LiDCO measurements in isoflurane-anaesthetized ponies. This difference was influenced by inotropic/vasoactive drugs.
Journal: VETERINARY ANAESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA
ISSN: 1467-2987
Issue: 3
Volume: 36
Pages: 197 - 208
Publication year:2009
Accessibility:Closed